コンテンツへスキップ
Home » Personality Lab » How National Values Shape Happiness: 29-Country Study

How National Values Shape Happiness: 29-Country Study

    株式会社SUNBLAZE

    National values and happiness research reveals a surprising truth: living in a country that shares your personal values does not automatically make you happier. In fact, for certain types of values, the opposite tends to be true. Whether value alignment boosts or undermines your well-being depends entirely on which values are involved — and understanding this distinction could change how you think about where and how you live.

    This article is based on a large-scale international study published in Nature Communications, titled Well-being as a function of person-country fit in human values. Covering 29 European countries and 54,673 participants, the research used rigorous statistical methods to explore the complex relationship between cultural value alignment and psychological well-being. The findings challenge longstanding assumptions about cultural fit, collectivism, individualism, and happiness — and offer actionable insight for anyone reflecting on their own life satisfaction.

    Once again, personality researcher and author of Villain Encyclopedia, Tokiwa (@etokiwa999), will provide the explanation.
    ※We have developed the HEXACO-JP Personality Assessment! It has more scientific basis than MBTI. Tap below for details.

    What Is National Values and Happiness Research?

    National values and happiness research examines how the dominant values of a country or culture interact with an individual’s personal values to shape psychological well-being. The central concept is “person-country fit” — the degree to which an individual’s values align with those of the broader society they live in. Intuitively, many people assume that higher alignment always leads to greater happiness, but cross-national happiness research suggests a far more nuanced picture.

    The study analyzed 10 distinct value types, grouped into 3 broad categories based on Schwartz’s well-established value theory:

    • Openness-to-change values: Self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism — these emphasize personal freedom, novelty, and pleasure.
    • Conservation values: Security, achievement, and power — these prioritize stability, social order, and personal success within established structures.
    • Social values: Universalism, benevolence, tradition, and conformity — these center on relationships, community, and shared norms.

    The key insight from cultural values well-being research is that each category interacts with its social environment in fundamentally different ways. For openness values, fitting in with your country’s culture tends to reduce well-being. For conservation values, fitting in tends to increase it. This 180-degree reversal depending on value type is one of the most striking findings in recent cross-national happiness research.

    How the Study Was Conducted: 29 Countries, 54,673 Participants

    This study is one of the largest of its kind, covering 28 European countries plus Israel — 29 nations in total — with data from 54,673 individuals whose average age was approximately 48 years. Among the participants, 29,727 were women and 24,929 were men. Researchers also conducted a regional-level analysis covering 184 regions and 45,282 individuals, adding an additional layer of precision to the findings.

    Values were measured using a 21-item questionnaire based on Schwartz’s 10-value model, and well-being was assessed across 6 comprehensive dimensions:

    • Evaluative well-being: Life satisfaction and overall happiness (correlation r = 0.71)
    • Emotional well-being: Emotional states experienced in the past week (α = 0.82)
    • Functioning: Sense of autonomy and self-esteem (α = 0.85)
    • Vitality: Energy levels and sleep quality (α = 0.69)
    • Community well-being: Closeness to and trust in others (α = 0.67)
    • Supportive relationships: Reverse-scored loneliness items (α = 0.57)

    The statistical method used was polynomial regression analysis — a precise technique that can detect non-linear relationships between variables. Age, gender, education level, and income were all included as control variables. Significance was set at the strict 0.001 level, and adjustments were made to account for multiple comparisons. This level of methodological rigor makes the findings especially credible within value congruence mental health research.

    Openness Values: When Fitting In Lowers Your Happiness

    For openness-to-change values — including self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism — research indicates that higher person-country fit is actually associated with lower well-being. Statistically, stimulation showed a negative fit coefficient of -1.99, and self-direction showed -1.85, meaning that the more a person’s openness values matched their country’s dominant culture, the worse their well-being tended to be. These are classified in the literature as “anxiety-free values,” emphasizing personal growth, freedom, and exploration.

    • Self-direction: Valuing independence, creativity, and the freedom to choose one’s own goals
    • Stimulation: Seeking novelty, excitement, and varied life experiences
    • Hedonism: Prioritizing enjoyment, pleasure, and personal gratification

    People who strongly hold openness values tend to define themselves through differentiation from others — they derive a sense of identity from being unique or unconventional. When the surrounding culture strongly reinforces the same values, this sense of distinctiveness may be diluted, removing a key psychological benefit. In other words, if everyone around you also prioritizes freedom and novelty, those qualities can lose their meaning as personal identity markers. For such individuals, a culturally homogeneous environment — even one aligned with their own values — can feel psychologically constricting. This dynamic is particularly relevant in discussions of collectivism, individualism, and happiness.

    Conservation Values: When Fitting In Raises Your Happiness

    For conservation values — including security, achievement, and power — the research shows the opposite pattern: higher person-country fit is associated with higher well-being. Statistically, achievement showed a positive fit coefficient of +1.15, and security showed +0.64. These values are classified as “anxiety-avoidance values,” reflecting a preference for stability, predictability, and social order.

    • Security: Prioritizing safety for oneself, one’s family, and society as a whole
    • Achievement: Seeking personal success and the demonstration of competence within accepted social standards
    • Power: Valuing social status, prestige, and influence over others and resources

    People who prioritize conservation values tend to draw comfort from social harmony and shared norms. When the wider culture reinforces the same values — emphasizing order, success within established structures, and institutional trust — these individuals can more easily validate their personal goals and behaviors. The cultural environment essentially acts as a confirmation that their priorities are legitimate and worthwhile, reducing cognitive dissonance and social friction. This pattern is particularly consistent with research on conservation values and life satisfaction: when the social environment “agrees” with your fundamental beliefs about how life should be organized, stress decreases and a sense of belonging tends to increase. Personal values alignment with one’s national culture appears to be especially protective for those who hold these anxiety-avoidance orientations.

    Personality Types and Adaptive Strategies: What This Means for You

    Viewed through the lens of Big Five personality theory, individuals high in Openness and those high in Conscientiousness tend to thrive in very different cultural environments. Highly open individuals generally prefer diverse, pluralistic environments where nonconformity is tolerated or celebrated. Highly conscientious individuals, by contrast, tend to feel more at ease in environments with clear expectations, rules, and shared standards. A similar distinction appears in MBTI terms between Intuitive (N) and Sensing (S) types when it comes to environmental adaptation patterns.

    • High Openness / Intuitive types: Well-being tends to improve in culturally diverse environments where value pluralism is the norm
    • High Conscientiousness / Sensing types: Well-being tends to improve in culturally unified environments where shared norms provide structure
    • High Neuroticism individuals: Research suggests that alignment with security values may play a particularly important role in reducing anxiety and boosting mental health

    One especially interesting finding concerns stimulation values specifically: researchers observed an inverted U-shaped (curvilinear) relationship between stimulation value fit and well-being across all 6 well-being dimensions. People who moderately sought stimulation showed the highest well-being, outperforming both those who strongly craved novelty and those who sought very little of it. This suggests that balance — rather than extreme alignment or extreme misalignment — may be the key to psychological health. It also implies that the relationship between personal values alignment and mental health is not simply linear, and that “more fit” is not always better.

    Writer & Supervisor: Eisuke Tokiwa
    Personality Psychology Researcher / CEO, SUNBLAZE Inc.

    As a child he experienced poverty, domestic abuse, bullying, truancy and dropping out of school — first-hand exposure to a range of social problems. He spent 10 years researching these issues and published Encyclopedia of Villains through Jiyukokuminsha. Since then he has independently researched the determinants of social problems and antisocial behavior (work, education, health, personality, genetics, region, etc.) and has published 2 peer-reviewed journal articles (Frontiers in Psychology, IEEE Access). His goal is to predict the occurrence of social problems. Spiky profile (WAIS-IV).

    Expertise: Personality Psychology / Big Five / HEXACO / MBTI / Prediction of Social Problems

    Researcher profiles: ORCID / Google Scholar / ResearchGate

    Social & Books: X (@etokiwa999) / note / Amazon Author Page

    Actionable Advice: Using These Findings to Improve Your Well-Being

    Understanding whether your dominant values fall into the openness or conservation category is a practical first step toward creating a more fulfilling environment for yourself. Here are evidence-informed strategies based on the research findings:

    If You Hold Strong Openness Values

    Seek out subcultures, communities, or workplaces that celebrate diversity rather than conformity — even if your broader national culture shares your values. Research suggests that your well-being may benefit more from environments where your individuality stands out rather than blends in. Consider traveling, living abroad, or joining multicultural communities. The goal is not to escape your values, but to find contexts where they retain their meaning as expressions of your unique identity.

    If You Hold Strong Conservation Values

    Actively seek cultural and social environments that reinforce shared norms and stable structures. This might mean choosing communities with strong civic institutions, clear social expectations, or deeply rooted traditions. Studies indicate that value congruence in these areas acts as a psychological buffer against uncertainty and social anxiety, so investing in communities where your values are widely shared is likely to pay dividends in life satisfaction and emotional well-being.

    If You Are Unsure Which Category Fits You

    Reflect on what tends to energize you versus what tends to reassure you. Do you feel more alive when exploring unfamiliar ideas and breaking routines? Or do you feel most at peace when life is organized, predictable, and socially validated? Both orientations are equally valid — the key is recognizing which environment supports your particular psychological makeup. The research on cultural values and well-being consistently shows that self-awareness about your own value profile is one of the most powerful tools for life satisfaction.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Does living in a country that shares your values always make you happier?

    Not necessarily. Research indicates that the effect of person-country value fit on happiness depends heavily on the type of values involved. For conservation values (like security and achievement), higher cultural alignment tends to boost well-being. For openness values (like self-direction and stimulation), higher alignment tends to reduce well-being. The relationship is more complex than a simple “more fit = more happiness” formula.

    What is “person-country fit” in the context of happiness research?

    Person-country fit refers to the degree of alignment between an individual’s personal values and the dominant values of the country they live in. It is a key concept in cross-national happiness research and cultural values well-being studies. Higher fit means the individual’s value priorities closely match those of their national culture, while lower fit indicates a significant divergence between personal and cultural values.

    Which values are considered “openness values” in this research?

    In Schwartz’s value theory, which this research is based on, openness-to-change values include self-direction (valuing independence and creativity), stimulation (seeking novelty and excitement), and hedonism (prioritizing enjoyment and pleasure). These are sometimes called “anxiety-free values” because they are associated with growth, freedom, and exploration rather than the avoidance of threat or uncertainty.

    Why might value alignment hurt well-being for people who value freedom and novelty?

    People who strongly value self-direction or stimulation tend to define their identity partly through being different from others. When the surrounding culture shares the same values, this sense of distinctiveness is reduced, which may undermine a key source of psychological meaning and identity. Studies suggest that for these individuals, cultural diversity — rather than cultural uniformity — tends to be the more psychologically nourishing environment.

    How does this research relate to collectivism and individualism?

    The findings connect directly to the collectivism-individualism dimension studied in cultural psychology. Collectivist cultures tend to emphasize conservation values like conformity, tradition, and security — and people who hold these values tend to thrive in such environments. Individualistic cultures tend to promote openness values. Research on collectivism, individualism, and happiness suggests that the match between personality and cultural orientation matters at least as much as the cultural orientation itself.

    What was the sample size and geographic scope of the study this article is based on?

    The study covered 29 countries — 28 European nations plus Israel — and included data from 54,673 participants with an average age of approximately 48 years. A regional-level analysis was also conducted across 184 regions with 45,282 participants. This large and geographically diverse sample makes it one of the most robust studies in the field of cross-national happiness research and value congruence mental health.

    Can I apply these findings even if I am not planning to move countries?

    Absolutely. The principles extend beyond national borders to local communities, workplaces, social circles, and even online communities. If your dominant values are openness-oriented, surrounding yourself with diverse people and ideas — even within your home country — may improve your well-being. If your values are conservation-oriented, investing in stable, structured communities with shared norms is likely to be beneficial. Personal values alignment matters at every scale of social environment.

    Summary: Your Values, Your Environment, Your Well-Being

    The science of national values and happiness research offers a genuinely counterintuitive lesson: fitting in with your culture is not a universal recipe for happiness. For those who value freedom, novelty, and self-expression, cultural distinctiveness tends to support well-being, while blending into a like-minded culture may actually diminish it. For those who value security, stability, and social achievement, cultural alignment tends to be deeply protective of mental health and life satisfaction. The relationship between value congruence and mental health is shaped not just by how well you “fit” your environment, but by which values you are aligning — or diverging from. Understanding your own value profile is arguably the first and most important step you can take toward building a life that genuinely supports your well-being. Reflect on which of your core values drive you most — then ask yourself whether your current environment is helping those values flourish, or quietly working against them.